Digital Mind

The End of Moore’s Law? Don’t Bet on it.

I see no real end of Moore's Law as a measure of computing power, because it's not just about smaller transistors. Industry analysts keep predicting the end of Moore’s Law, arguing for many reasons that computer chips can only get so small or so cheap, and in 2015 I responded with optimism from decades of experience at IBM, as a consultant, and as a futurist. (Updated twice since.)

In Moore’s Law and The Future of Health Care, I offered a 2013 vision of healthcare based on exponential advancements in tech innovation as described by Gordon Moore. Moore is an Intel cofounder and is credited with observing that computer circuits have shrunk in size and doubling in compute capacity every two years. Moore’s Law is what drives down costs & size, but that logarithmic trend is not easy to grasp. So let’s look at two analogies explaining a 60,000 improvement in cost and 90,000 improvement in speed since Intel started tracking computer chips in the 1960’s.

COST — If the price of cars and gas improved exponentially at the same rate as computer chips, we’d be able to buy a new car for about 8-cents today and would only spend 2-cents per year on gas. At that rate, cars would be disposable, and we might just buy a new one for each trip, as a fashion accessory matched to our outfit.

SPEED — If the speed of air travel advanced at the same exponential rate as computing, today we’d be able to fly from the U.S. to Japan in less than a second, but the plane would be just over 1-tenth of an inch long.

The End of Moore’s Law? Don’t Bet on it. 

Moore’s Law defined transistor size, but the more important trends go beyond that. Transistors are just one part of processor chips, and processors are just one part of servers, so I’m not worried about physical limitations of semiconductor manufacturing that might limit transistor size. Other computing architectures will surely emerge, including vertical chip stacking and organic, optical, parallel, and quantum computing, moving us beyond information processing and toward shared human knowledge and digital consciousness.

Consider software evolution as it transitioned from machine language to assembler language, 3rd generation languages (FORTRAN, COBOL, PL/1), application generators, and the open-source movement with online sharing of ideas and code. Each new tool enabled the creation of better tools so we could create ever-faster and more powerful systems more quickly.

Next may be artificial intelligence and machine learning. Just as the brain evolves with ever-more synapse connections between neurons, computing may evolve exponentially with more connections between each processor, clusters of processors, and computing systems. And each processor will eventually be the size of cells, implanted and connected to neurons, providing an efficient brain-computer interface and enabling a brain-brain interface that supports the idea of shared consciousness. Futurist Ray Kurzweil describes a vision where tiny embedded processors may each have the processing power of the human brain, and then the human race.

Now consider that there are 100 billion neurons that they might individually be connected to. No, I don’t think the computing evolution will slow. It will accelerate exponentially as it has with Moore’s Law and probably faster.

The world’s smallest transistor – with zero size

While skeptics worry Moore’s Law is running out of steam, Futurist Matthew Griffin tells us that researchers have already developed the world’s smallest transistor the size of a photon. Beside the small size, essentially zero, photons have appeal in quantum computing because they can swiftly shuttle information over long distances, use far less energy, and are compatible with fabricated chips. I recently came across his 38-min keynote presentation from the The Future is GREAT, a conference exploring everything the future has to offer, and how the UK Government can use it to spur growth, investment, and jobs.

Griffin spoke of the combination of different exponential technologies and the disruption and opportunities across industries, including healthcare. His examples included telesurgery, 3D printing of human organs, Crisper gene editing in living patients, and the smartphone based tricorder.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Wayne Caswell is a retired IBM technologist, futurist, market strategist, consumer advocate, sleep economist, and founding editor of Modern Health Talk. With international leadership experience developing wireless networks, sensors, and smart home technologies, he’s been an advocate for Big Broadband and fiber-to-the-home while also enjoying success lobbying for consumers. Wayne leans left to support progressive policies but considers himself politically independent. (contact & BIO)

USAGE – If you republish any elements from this article or website, please be sure to add a link back to the source.

 Related Articles

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *